There are no products in your shopping cart.
|
|
||||
|
Navigation User login Recent blog posts
|
Submitted by KM5H on Tue, 10/30/2007 - 19:19.
Below are two pictures of a test, first the standard SoftRock with a crystal and the second one using a SI570 chip. They are very similar with no appreciable extra spurs on added noise. SoftRock connected to a dummy load using a crystal. SoftRock connected to a dummy load using the SI570 12-25-2007 Some good news to day, below is an email from Mike Collins KF4BQ, he received his CMOS version of the SI570 and did some test on it, he reports very close results when compared to a crystal oscillator, that is really good news. The LVDS has even lower jitter so it should get even better results. Below is a copy of his email; To: softrock40@yahoogroups.com I was able to get one of my Si570 running at the startup freq One of the concerns folk had was the phase noise performance of the The results of the tests came out excellent for the CMOS Si570; almost 1dB Blocking (100 Khz spacing), 1.0uV(-107dBm) reference: Blocking 1dB Blocking (2 Khz spacing), 1.0uV(-107dBm) reference: Blocking level I will put a summary of my testing on a Softrock20MRXTX v6.2 (with Now, if I can just get some I2C controls to work!! Have fun, Mike Collins KF4BQ Later he will use his Spectrum analyzer to compare the results of the crystal clock to the Si570. Look for the link below for a PDF file with the SI570's specifications
|
Click title to display cart contents.
There are no products in your shopping cart.
Si570 Group Buy Active forum topics Popular content Poll |
||